The NTSB puts out a “Most Wanted”
list that states what areas they believe need to be addressed to increase
safety. This year’s list has cockpit image recorders, prevent loss of control
in flight, fatigue related accidents, reducing distractions, and medical
fitness in that order. However, from my experience, I believe this order does not
make sense for the industry. From the pilot’s perspective I believe the order
should be listed in this order to represent the best safety interest for the
industry. I would list the order as fatigue related accidents; prevent loss of
control in flight, medical fitness, reducing distractions, and cockpit image
recorders. This is because I believe fatigue is a large issue that directly
causes crashes, as well as, increases the likelihood of issues in other areas.
While cockpit image recorders are trivial and wont actively increase safety
like the other issues will.
I
believe that cockpit image recorders should not be listed on the NTSB’s “Most
Wanted” safety improvements. While the idea sounds possible when thinking from
an outside perspective, the overarching theme is baseless and is mainly a ploy
to prove to the general public that the safety has been improved. “Premature
overreaction … Cockpit image recorders will not improve safety and could, in
fact, impede it by diverting limited resources that could be used for more
valuable safety enhancements” (Air Traffic Management, 2015). The overall
concept is irreverent. The staple of the argument is the Malaysian air flight,
which was never discovered, and having a camera in the cockpit would not have solved that issue.
While the NTSB did a good job
ensuring the objective and also preparing this list creates a good baseline for
the rest of the industry in safety. I believe they should remove the cockpit
image recorder. The Air Line Pilots Association, “also
specifically notes ‘pilot inattention due to workload, distractions or complacency,
and a lack of understanding how a stall actually relates to exceeding a wing’s
critical angle of attack (AOA)’" (Bellamy, 2016). This further shows the
importance of maintaining control of the aircraft versus using cameras to
scapegoat the pilots, and prevent them from working in a positive and
productive environment. I believe the focus should be on better enabling pilots with knowledge and the capacity to provide the optimal level of performance. This is why I believe the NTSB should have included runway incursions to their list. Runway incursions are a large hazard and are common in general aviation. Runway incursions directly put the pilots and passengers of both aircraft in danger, and need to be mitigated as much as possible.
I believe the FAA is most likely to
respond to, the reevaluating of the fatigued rules imposed on the crew. It is
very common to hear from pilots that they have awful crew rest rules, and that
they are not able to execute as well when tired. Additionally, it causes a loss
of efficiency by pilots costing the airlines in fuel and timeliness. So it is
in the best interest of everyone to have pilots utilize a proper duty rest
period that allows themselves to fly safely and efficiency to their
destination.
References
Air
Traffic Management. (2015, January 27). NTSB repeats calls for cockpit video.
Retrieved from
http://www.airtrafficmanagement.net/2015/01/ntsb-repeats-calls-for-cockpit-video-surveillance/
Bellamy,
W., III. (2016, January 14). NTSB's 5 Most Wanted Aviation Safety Improvements
in 2016 Retrieved from http://www.aviationtoday.com/av/commercial/NTSBs-5-Most-Wanted-Aviation-Safety-Improvements-in-2016_86948.html#.Vwr8cRIrImJ
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI personally think medical fitness should still be last on the list. There has been a set in stone medical certification procedure that has been used. So why should they waste their time and money trying to alter something that is already working. The only issue I see with medical fitness would come from the GA pilots.
ReplyDeleteGreat point that the cockpit image recorder will not actually provide much of safety of the flight, it is only provide benefit of accident investigation. However according to many pilots, the camera will only increase additional stress to the pilot which will actually affect their judgment, which actually might cause hazard,
ReplyDeleteYou make two great points, runway incursions and image recorders don't provide a more safe environment. The fact that their focus is to make the skies safer not have video of a pilot struggling to keep the aircraft flying.
ReplyDelete